For licensed clinicians

Your clinical expertise helps evaluate and improve medical AI.

Senebiclabs brings licensed clinicians to structured, remote work on medical AI: judging the answers these systems give, labelling clinical data, and writing reference answers, each against a rubric written for the project.

Membership is by invitation. Requesting access adds you to our list; it does not create an account.

  • Clinical, not technicalNo AI experience needed. The judgment asked for is the one you use in practice.
  • Remote and self-pacedWork in your browser when it suits you. No shifts, no minimum hours.
  • Paid workRates and schedule are agreed with you in writing before you begin.

Why clinicians

Only a clinician can tell when a medical answer is wrong

Medical AI systems answer questions about symptoms, medicines and test results, and they sound just as confident when they are wrong. Whether an answer is correct, complete and safe is a clinical judgment, and it takes a clinician who works in that area to make it.

That is the work here. Clinicians read what a system said, judge it against the guidelines they already practise by, and record what is right, what is wrong and what is missing. Those judgments are what the system is measured against.

The work

What contributors do

Work comes in projects, and each project has one purpose. Which kinds you see depends on the projects you are given access to; not every clinician does every kind.

Assess the AI's answer

Why

A model's answer is only as good as the clinician who checks it. What you decide is what the model is measured and corrected against.

How

Read the case and the answer the model gave, with the project's rubric beside you. Say whether it holds up, identify errors, omissions and anything that could harm a patient, and rate it on the measures the project uses. Some projects also ask for a short written correction.

In every kind of work you can flag a case you cannot judge. The flag is recorded as work.

Who can contribute

Practising clinicians

There is nothing to buy and no training to complete first.

  • A current clinical licence
  • Active practice in a clinical specialty
  • Comfort reading and assessing written cases
  • A computer and a reliable internet connection

Every request is reviewed by our team. We invite clinicians whose specialty fits the work we have running, so requesting access does not guarantee an invitation.

How it works

From request to your first case

  1. Request access

    Tell us your name, your specialty and the country you practise in. It takes a minute and does not create an account.

  2. We review your request

    Our team reads every request. Where there is work that fits your practice, we email you an invitation. Not every request leads to one.

  3. Accept your invitation and the agreement

    The invitation creates your account. You then read and accept the reviewer agreement, which sets out the work, confidentiality and how you are paid.

  4. Work on the projects you are given

    Open cases from your dashboard when work is available, with the project's rubric beside each one. Work at your own pace; your answers are saved as you go.

  5. Your work is checked and recorded

    Other clinicians read the same items, and written answers are reviewed by a colleague. Every pass you make appears on your work record and is paid on the terms agreed with you.

Quality and trust

Careful clinical judgment, handled with care

What we ask of every contributor, and how case material and your identity are protected.

Accuracy over speed

There are no targets. Judge each case against the project's rubric and the standard of care you practise to, and take the time it needs.

Flag rather than guess

If a case is outside your area, unclear, or the rubric conflicts with your clinical judgment, flag it. A flag is recorded as work.

Safety first

Call out anything in an answer that could harm a patient, even when the rest of it is right.

Consistency

Apply the same rubric the same way across cases, so your readings can be compared with other clinicians'.

Confidential case material

Cases stay inside the platform and may contain de-identified patient information. You agree not to copy, retain, discuss or try to re-identify anything you read.

Access by project

You see only the projects you have been given access to. The platform enforces that on every request, and access can be withdrawn.

Independent and anonymous

You work independently of the organisations whose systems are evaluated, and your identity is never disclosed to them.

More than one clinician reads each item. On projects that use adjudication, disagreements go to a senior clinician. Written answers are reviewed by a colleague, and nobody reviews their own.

Compensation

How pay works

The terms that apply to you are agreed in writing, and set out in the reviewer agreement you accept when you join.

Agreed before you start

Your rate and payment schedule are agreed with you in writing before you begin. They are not published on the site or in the platform.

Every pass counts

Each case you judge, label or write is recorded, and so is each case you flag and each answer you review, including ones you send back.

A record you can check

Your work record lists every pass by kind, project and date. The platform does not yet show rates, balances or statements.

Questions

What clinicians ask

Who is eligible to apply?

Licensed clinicians who currently practise in a clinical specialty and are comfortable reading and assessing written cases. Request access with your name, specialty and the country you practise in. Every request is reviewed by our team, and an invitation is sent only where there is work that fits your practice, so requesting access does not guarantee an invitation.

What types of assignments are available?

Work comes in projects, and each project has one purpose: evaluating answers a medical AI system gave, labelling clinical data, or writing reference answers. Some written work also has a review stage, where a second clinician approves, edits or sends back a colleague's answer. Which of these you see depends on the projects you are given access to; not every clinician does every kind.

Does joining guarantee assignments?

No. Work depends on the projects we have running and on whether they match your specialty, so there may be periods with nothing available to you. Your dashboard shows what is open to you at any time.

How are submissions reviewed?

More than one clinician reads each item, and their readings are compared. On projects that use adjudication, items where clinicians disagree go to a senior clinician to resolve rather than being settled by majority. Written answers are read by a second clinician, who approves, edits or sends them back; nobody is ever given their own answer to review.

How is clinical information handled?

Case material is confidential and stays inside the platform. It may contain de-identified patient information, and you agree not to copy, retain, discuss or try to re-identify it. You see only the projects you have been given access to, and your identity is never disclosed to the organisations whose systems are being evaluated.

How is compensation determined?

Work is paid. Your rate and payment schedule are agreed with you in writing before you begin, and they are not published on the site or in the platform. Every pass you make is recorded, including cases you flag and written work you send back, and each is paid on the terms agreed with you.

Read all the questions

Put your clinical expertise to work

If you are a licensed clinician, request access. We review every request and email you if we have work that fits your practice.